build measure learn
Grow­ing with pur­pose: Impact man­age­ment for impact star­tups

This sec­tion is for you if …

  • you’ve launched an impact-dri­ven start­up.
  • you’ve clear­ly defined your tar­get group, the prob­lem you’re solv­ing, and the impact you want to cre­ate.
  • your MVP has been test­ed and val­i­dat­ed.
  • you’ve mapped out your impact poten­tial, mar­ket oppor­tu­ni­ty, and financ­ing mod­el.
  • the resources you need are in place.

In this sec­tion, you’ll learn how to …

  • make sure your busi­ness mod­el con­tin­ues to deliv­er impact.
  • devel­op impact indi­ca­tors for step 7 of your Impact Lad­der.
  • spot and address risks and unin­tend­ed effects ear­ly.

Devel­op­ing impact indi­ca­tors for step 7 of your Impact Lad­der

You’ve already worked your way through steps 1 to 6 – now it’s time to tack­le the final and most chal­leng­ing stage: mea­sur­ing the actu­al impact of your start­up. This lev­el is the hard­est to reach, which makes it all the more impor­tant to approach it thor­ough­ly. Here’s how to get start­ed with devel­op­ing your impact indi­ca­tors:

1. Gath­er ideas for indi­ca­tors

Start by brain­storm­ing indi­ca­tors that could reflect the soci­etal impact of your busi­ness mod­el. Exam­ples include:

  • Mea­sur­able con­tri­bu­tion to the UN Sus­tain­able Devel­op­ment Goals (SDGs)
  • Changes in rel­e­vant social met­rics (e.g., CO₂ reduc­tion in your tar­get region)
  • Long-term improve­ment in qual­i­ty-of-life indices
  • Tan­gi­ble shifts in laws or polit­i­cal sys­tems

Tip

Uses resources such as the UN SDG indi­ca­tors for inspi­ra­tion.

2. Struc­ture your indi­ca­tors

A clear struc­ture helps you use your indi­ca­tors effec­tive­ly lat­er on. Group your ideas into mean­ing­ful cat­e­gories. Make sure you include a mix of quan­ti­ta­tive (mea­sur­able data) and qual­i­ta­tive (more sub­jec­tive insights) indi­ca­tors. See how they relate to one anoth­er – often, qual­i­ta­tive insights build on quan­ti­ta­tive find­ings. For exam­ple, sur­vey data can help inter­pret how a pro­gram has improved qual­i­ty of life.

3. Make them S.M.AR.T.

The indi­ca­tors should be for­mu­lat­ed accord­ing to the S.M.A.R.T. prin­ci­ple:

  • Spe­cif­ic: clear­ly defined and unam­bigu­ous
  • Mea­sur­able: Quan­tifi­able
  • Attrac­tive: Rel­e­vant to your goal
  • Real­is­tic: Achiev­able with avail­able resources
  • Time-bound: Has a clear time­line

4. Pri­or­i­tize your indi­ca­tors

Not all indi­ca­tors are equal­ly use­ful, and too many can com­pli­cate your track­ing efforts. Focus on the ones that best reflect your impact and can real­is­ti­cal­ly be mea­sured. Ask your­selves:
ns:

  • Which indi­ca­tors align most close­ly with your impact goals?
  • Which data can you col­lect with your cur­rent resources?
  • Which indi­ca­tors mat­ter most to your stake­hold­ers or investors?

Iden­ti­fy and address poten­tial neg­a­tive effects

Mea­sur­ing your pos­i­tive impact is impor­tant – but so is iden­ti­fy­ing poten­tial neg­a­tive effects your busi­ness mod­el might cause. This 7‑step guide helps you car­ry out a sim­ple but effec­tive risk analy­sis:

1. Define the scope of your sys­tem

Nar­row down the area you want to assess so you can stay focused. Ana­lyze the spe­cif­ic prob­lem you aim to solve, with­out get­ting lost in too many details. This helps avoid over­whelm and lets you use your resources effi­cient­ly. For more on this, see “Prob­lem, tar­get group, and stake­hold­er analy­sis: Your first step toward launch­ing an impact start­up.”

2. Iden­ti­fy all rel­e­vant stake­hold­ers

Make a list that includes both sup­port­ers and poten­tial crit­ics – cus­tomers, users, part­ners, deci­sion-mak­ers, and more. That way, you cap­ture all per­spec­tives. Details on this are found under“Prob­lem, tar­get group, and stake­hold­er analy­sis: Your first step toward launch­ing an impact start­up.

3. Map your sys­tem com­po­nents

Cre­ate a visu­al map of the sys­tem your start­up oper­ates in. Con­nect the key actors, process­es, and resources in your mod­el. This will help you spot inter­ac­tions, risks, and unin­tend­ed side effects.

4. Ana­lyze inter­ac­tions

Explore how your solu­tion inter­acts with oth­er parts of the sys­tem and look for feed­back loops. Ask your­self whether it might trig­ger unex­pect­ed con­se­quences or long-term side effects – for exam­ple, if help­ing one group unin­ten­tion­al­ly harms anoth­er.

5. Account for exter­nal fac­tors

Iden­ti­fy out­side influ­ences – like polit­i­cal shifts, eco­nom­ic trends, or envi­ron­men­tal risks – that could affect your busi­ness mod­el. These can either strength­en or weak­en your approach.

6. Assess poten­tial neg­a­tive impacts

Exam­ine which groups or sys­tems might expe­ri­ence down­sides as a result of your work. Esti­mate how like­ly and how seri­ous those risks are so you can pri­or­i­tize the most press­ing ones. This forms the foun­da­tion for tar­get­ed respons­es.

7. Devel­op mit­i­ga­tion strate­gies

Cre­ate strate­gies to reduce or elim­i­nate the risks you’ve iden­ti­fied. That might mean adjust­ing your solu­tion, shift­ing your focus, or chang­ing how you deliv­er your prod­uct or ser­vice. The goal is to design your process­es with both pos­i­tive and neg­a­tive impacts in mind.

Case study: TOMS Shoes

The sto­ry of TOMS Shoes shows how well-inten­tioned busi­ness mod­els can lead to unin­tend­ed con­se­quences. The company’s mod­el of donat­ing one pair of shoes for every pair sold – its “One for One” approach – end­ed up weak­en­ing local shoe mar­kets in coun­tries across the Glob­al South. Steps like shift­ing toward local pro­duc­tion helped reduce some of these neg­a­tive effects.

  • Sys­tem bound­aries: TOMS’ “One for One” mod­el and its impact on local shoe indus­tries in the Glob­al South
  • Rel­e­vant stake­hold­ers: TOMS Shoes, cus­tomers in indus­tri­al­ized coun­tries, shoe recip­i­ents in the Glob­al South, local shoe pro­duc­ers and retail­ers, local com­mu­ni­ties, NGOs, TOMS sup­pli­ers and man­u­fac­tur­ers, investors
  • Sys­tem com­po­nents: TOMS’ pro­duc­tion and dis­tri­b­u­tion, dona­tion pro­gram, local shoe mar­kets in the Glob­al South, glob­al sup­ply chain, mar­ket­ing and brand image, finan­cial resources and invest­ment
  • Sys­tem inter­ac­tions: Pos­i­tive feed­back loop: More sales lead to more dona­tions, boost­ing the brand and dri­ving fur­ther sales. Neg­a­tive feed­back loop: Dona­tions can hurt local mar­kets, wors­en­ing pover­ty and increas­ing long-term depen­dence on aid.
  • Exter­nal influ­ences: Glob­al eco­nom­ic trends, shifts in con­sumer atti­tudes toward eth­i­cal prod­ucts, polit­i­cal sta­bil­i­ty in recip­i­ent coun­tries, advances in footwear pro­duc­tion tech­nol­o­gy
  • Poten­tial neg­a­tive impacts: Dis­place­ment of local shoe pro­duc­ers and retail­ers; depen­den­cy on donat­ed goods in recip­i­ent com­mu­ni­ties; poten­tial qual­i­ty con­cerns with donat­ed shoes
  • Mit­i­ga­tion strate­gies: Focus on local pro­duc­tion to sup­port region­al economies; expand the “One for One” mod­el into areas like edu­ca­tion and health; part­ner with local NGOs to sup­port sus­tain­able devel­op­ment; invest in train­ing for local shoe­mak­ers and sup­port local busi­ness­es

Impor­tant note: When eval­u­at­ing poten­tial neg­a­tive effects, don’t just con­sid­er finan­cial impact. Ask how much con­trol or influ­ence your start­up has over the root caus­es. Some soci­etal prob­lems can only be solved through reg­u­la­to­ry action, since vol­un­tary efforts may put impact-dri­ven star­tups at a com­pet­i­tive dis­ad­van­tage.

Also con­sid­er inter­nal risks – such as poor labor con­di­tions with­in your own com­pa­ny. To uncov­er these issues, start with process map­ping as part of your ESG man­age­ment strat­e­gy (see Grow with impact: team, process­es, and cul­ture for impact star­tups”).

ESG man­age­ment

Here you’ll find cri­te­ria to help you build a sol­id ESG (envi­ron­men­tal, social, and gov­er­nance) man­age­ment frame­work tai­lored to your process­es.

You can also explore whether a Social Life Cycle Assess­ment (S‑LCA) might be use­ful for your solu­tion. S‑LCA is a method for assess­ing the social and socio-eco­nom­ic impacts of prod­ucts, ser­vices, or sys­tems across their entire life cycle. It helps orga­ni­za­tions under­stand, eval­u­ate, and improve their social impact – ulti­mate­ly con­tribut­ing to more sus­tain­able and respon­si­ble pro­duc­tion and use of goods and ser­vices. Learn more here.

Next step: Track your KPIs

You’ve now laid the ground­work to secure the long-term impact of your busi­ness mod­el – and iden­ti­fied poten­tial risks or neg­a­tive effects your work might cre­ate at dif­fer­ent lev­els.

Before you move on to mea­sur­ing KPIs and build­ing a base­line sce­nario, take time to pre­pare your team, struc­ture, and orga­ni­za­tion­al cul­ture for the growth phase and start shap­ing a strat­e­gy for your busi­ness growth.