build measure learn
Prob­lem, tar­get group and stake­hold­er analy­sis: Your first step towards launch­ing an impact start­up

This sec­tion is for you if …

  • you’re plan­ning to launch an impact start­up – or already deep in the process with your team.
  • you know what prob­lem you want to solve but don’t yet ful­ly under­stand who your tar­get group is.

In this sec­tion, you’ll learn how to …

  • clear­ly define the social prob­lem and under­stand its root caus­es.
  • iden­ti­fy the effects of the prob­lem.
  • define your tar­get group and stake­hold­ers.

Define the core prob­lem

The first step is to clear­ly define the prob­lem you want to solve. This sets the foun­da­tion for ana­lyz­ing its root caus­es and con­se­quences. Describe the issue from the per­spec­tive of the peo­ple affect­ed by it. Try to be as spe­cif­ic as pos­si­ble and base this on what you cur­rent­ly know.

Social prob­lems often exist on dif­fer­ent lev­els: social, envi­ron­men­tal, and eco­nom­ic.

  • Social dimen­sion: his relates to how peo­ple inter­act and how soci­ety is struc­tured. It includes top­ics like social jus­tice, edu­ca­tion, health, and com­mu­ni­ty net­works.
  • Envi­ron­men­tal dimen­sion: This involves cli­mate and envi­ron­men­tal issues, such as glob­al warm­ing, bio­di­ver­si­ty loss, soil degra­da­tion, or water scarci­ty.
  • Eco­nom­ic dimen­sion: This cov­ers finan­cial and eco­nom­ic fac­tors like income lev­els, wealth dis­tri­b­u­tion, or eco­nom­ic devel­op­ment.

Exam­ple:

“Many peo­ple in rur­al areas of Lebanon lack access to clean drink­ing water.”

Iden­ti­fy the root caus­es of the prob­lem

To ful­ly under­stand the core prob­lem, you can break down its caus­es in four steps. Start by ask­ing: Why does this prob­lem exist?

1. Iden­ti­fy key cat­e­gories of root caus­es

Sort the prob­lem into main caus­es and assign them to the fol­low­ing cat­e­gories:

  • Social trends (e.g., demo­graph­ic shifts, urban­iza­tion, dig­i­tal­iza­tion, reg­u­la­tions, laws, stan­dards)
  • Use of tech­nol­o­gy (e.g., fos­sil or renew­able ener­gy, e‑learning plat­forms, telemed­i­cine)
  • Eco­nom­ic con­di­tions (e.g., unem­ploy­ment, income inequal­i­ty, infla­tion)
  • Cul­tur­al under­stand­ing (e.g., tra­di­tions, cus­toms, val­ues, social norms)
  • Envi­ron­men­tal con­di­tions (e.g., cli­mate change, resource avail­abil­i­ty, nat­ur­al dis­as­ters)
  • Insti­tu­tions (e.g., schools, health­care providers, local orga­ni­za­tions, com­mu­ni­ty ini­tia­tives)
  • Polit­i­cal con­di­tions (e.g., gov­ern­ment sta­bil­i­ty, inter­na­tion­al trade agree­ments, sanc­tions)
  • Indi­vid­ual needs of spe­cif­ic groups (e.g., access to edu­ca­tion, health­care, hous­ing)
  • Pub­lic knowl­edge and aware­ness (e.g., edu­ca­tion lev­els, aware­ness, tech lit­er­a­cy)

2. Dig into the caus­es using the 5 Whys tech­nique

To explore the prob­lem more deeply, ask “Why is this hap­pen­ing?” for each cause you’ve iden­ti­fied – and repeat that ques­tion five times. This helps uncov­er the root caus­es. These deep­er insights form the foun­da­tion of your prob­lem and give you a fuller under­stand­ing of it.

Exam­ple:

If the core prob­lem is “Many peo­ple in rur­al areas of Lebanon lack access to clean drink­ing water,” a 5 Whys analy­sis might look like this:

  • Why don’t they have access to clean drink­ing water? – Because there are no water treat­ment facil­i­ties.
  • Why are there no water treat­ment facil­i­ties? – Because there isn’t enough fund­ing.
  • Why isn’t there enough fund­ing? – Because local author­i­ties don’t allo­cate suf­fi­cient bud­gets.
  • Why don’t local author­i­ties allo­cate enough bud­gets? – Because the issue isn’t seen as a pri­or­i­ty.
  • Why isn’t it a pri­or­i­ty? – Because there’s low aware­ness of the health risks linked to unsafe water.

3. Use research to sup­port your analy­sis

Use data­bas­es like Google Schol­ar, JSTOR, or PubMed to find rel­e­vant stud­ies and data. Pub­lic reports (e.g., from the UNDP or nation­al gov­ern­ments), sta­tis­tics, doc­u­men­taries, news fea­tures, and pub­li­ca­tions from asso­ci­a­tions can also be help­ful – just make sure to fact-check your sources.

Attend­ing net­work­ing events, con­fer­ences, indus­try mee­tups, or expos can also give you valu­able insights.
This data-dri­ven approach gives you objec­tive per­spec­tives on the root caus­es of the prob­lem – and helps con­firm or chal­lenge your assump­tions.

Ana­lyze the effects of the prob­lem

Once you’ve explored the caus­es, the next step is to iden­ti­fy the effects. What con­se­quences does the prob­lem have for the peo­ple affect­ed – and for their broad­er envi­ron­ment?

1. Use the 5 Whys tech­nique to explore the effects

Use the same method as before. For each effect, ask: “What does this lead to?” Repeat the ques­tion to uncov­er deep­er, sys­temic impacts – whether envi­ron­men­tal, polit­i­cal, social, eco­nom­ic, cul­tur­al or even spir­i­tu­al.

2. Back up your analy­sis with cur­rent research

Use recent stud­ies and data to bet­ter under­stand the long-term effects of the prob­lem. How you can do this is described above under Iden­ti­fy the root caus­es of the prob­lem.

3. Visu­al­ize the prob­lem with a prob­lem tree

A prob­lem tree is a visu­al tool that maps out the caus­es and effects of the issue – and can also be use­ful when pre­sent­ing your work. Here’s how to build a one:

  • Draw a box in the cen­ter of your dia­gram and write the core prob­lem in it.
  • Below it, list the direct caus­es. Add deep­er caus­es under­neath those.
  • Above the core prob­lem, write the imme­di­ate effects. Then, above those, list the rip­ple effects.
  • The prob­lem tree branch­es upwards and down­wards.
  • Use arrows or lines to show any con­nec­tions between caus­es or effects. Leave place­hold­ers for any miss­ing pieces you’ll fill in lat­er.

You can sketch the prob­lem tree using a basic draw­ing tool or just pen and paper.
PHI­NEO’s Social Impact Nav­i­ga­toralso includes a help­ful visu­al tem­plate:

Con­sid­er the sys­temic con­text

To ful­ly under­stand the prob­lem, you should place it in a broad­er sys­temic con­text. This helps you design inter­ven­tions that address the right caus­es – at the right lev­el.

1. Use the social change matrix to map your prob­lem in con­text

The social change matrix helps you place the prob­lem in a broad­er sys­tem by divid­ing it into four quad­rants:

  • Quad­rant 1: Mate­r­i­al and struc­tur­al – Prob­lems that affect large groups and require struc­tur­al change, such as legal or insti­tu­tion­al reforms
  • Quad­rant 2: Mate­r­i­al and indi­vid­ual – Out­comes of struc­tur­al prob­lems that impact indi­vid­u­als or small groups, such as lack of edu­ca­tion or pover­ty
  • Quad­rant 3: Sym­bol­ic and struc­tur­al – Prob­lems relat­ed to pub­lic per­cep­tion or col­lec­tive beliefs that require changes in pub­lic dis­course
  • Quad­rant 4: Sym­bol­ic and indi­vid­ual – Prob­lems tied to per­son­al atti­tudes or self-per­cep­tion, like low self-esteem

Think about how your prob­lem shows up in each quad­rant. Do all four need to be con­sid­ered? Where do the root caus­es and effects sit, and which ones should you address? Mate­r­i­al change is tan­gi­ble and mea­sur­able. Sym­bol­ic change deals with cul­tur­al norms and social atti­tudes.

Struc­tur­al changes hap­pens at a sys­tem or soci­ety lev­el. Indi­vid­ual changes affects per­son­al behav­ior and mind­set.

Some­times, how­ev­er, change on an indi­vid­ual lev­el – mate­r­i­al or sym­bol­ic – can spark broad­er sys­temic shifts. In oth­er words, change doesn’t only come from the top down; it can also start bot­tom up. A shift in val­ues, for exam­ple, can even­tu­al­ly trans­form struc­tur­al or mate­r­i­al con­di­tions.

Exam­ple:

Let’s say your core prob­lem is “low envi­ron­men­tal aware­ness among the pub­lic”. This would fall under Quad­rant 3 (sym­bol­ic and struc­tur­al) because it reflects pub­lic per­cep­tion and calls for a shift in pub­lic dis­course.

Poten­tial solu­tions might include aware­ness cam­paigns or pol­i­cy ini­tia­tives to strength­en envi­ron­men­tal con­scious­ness (sym­bol­ic), and actions that pro­mote behav­ior change (mate­r­i­al).

Define your tar­get groups and stake­hold­ers

Based on your prob­lem analy­sis, you can now clear­ly define your tar­get groups and stake­hold­ers.
Think about who is direct­ly respon­si­ble for the root caus­es of and who is affect­ed by the con­se­quences. These are like­ly your poten­tial tar­get groups and stake­hold­ers.

1. Who are your tar­get groups?

Your tar­get group includes the peo­ple, orga­ni­za­tions or sys­tems you want to cre­ate impact for. The ones you want to bring real change to are your direct tar­get group. If need­ed, you can break this group down fur­ther into sub­groups to tai­lor your solu­tion more pre­cise­ly.

2. Who are your stake­hold­ers?

Stake­hold­ers include any per­sons or groups who have an inter­est in your solu­tion or who can influ­ence its suc­cess. Impor­tant: All tar­get groups are stake­hold­ers, but not all stake­hold­ers are part of your tar­get group.

A stake­hold­er analy­sis can help you answer key ques­tions:

  • Who are the rel­e­vant inter­nal and exter­nal stake­hold­ers?
  • What are their expec­ta­tions, con­cerns, and hopes?
  • How might they sup­port – or chal­lenge – your solu­tion?

Exam­ples of stake­hold­ers:

  • Inter­nal stake­hold­ers: your tar­get group, team mem­bers, lead­er­ship.
  • Exter­nal stake­hold­ers: investors, gov­ern­ment agen­cies, NGOs, part­ner orga­ni­za­tions, grass­roots ini­tia­tives, or com­pa­nies.

Tar­get group vs. cus­tomers

In the Lean Impact Jour­ney we make a dis­tinc­tion between your tar­get group when work­ing on your impact mod­el and solu­tion, and your cus­tomers when devel­op­ing your busi­ness mod­el.

How you use these two terms depends on what your solu­tion looks like. In this play­book, the tar­get group refers to both the peo­ple who use your solu­tion and those who ben­e­fit from it.

Depend­ing on your solu­tion, these might be the same peo­ple – or not.

Next chap­ter: Val­i­date your find­ings

You’ve com­plet­ed the first major step! You now under­stand the root caus­es and effects of the social prob­lem and have iden­ti­fied your poten­tial tar­get group and key stake­hold­ers.

In the next chap­ter you’ll learn how to val­i­date your find­ings through real con­ver­sa­tions with your tar­get group and stake­hold­ers.