build measure learn
Prob­lem, tar­get group and stake­hold­er analy­sis: the first step towards an impact start­up

You’ve come to the right place if …

  • you want to found an impact start­up or are already in the mid­dle of it with your team.
  • you know what prob­lem you want to solve, but you don’t know your tar­get group yet or not yet well enough.

This chap­ter helps to …

  • iden­ti­fy the social prob­lem and under­stand its caus­es.
  • iden­ti­fy the effects of the prob­lem.
  • define your tar­get group and stake­hold­ers.

Iden­ti­fy the core prob­lem

The first step is to pre­cise­ly name the prob­lem you want to solve so that you can car­ry out a well-found­ed analy­sis of the caus­es and effects. The prob­lem should be for­mu­lat­ed in such a way that it describes the neg­a­tive sit­u­a­tion from the tar­get group’s point of view. Try to be as spe­cif­ic as pos­si­ble — depend­ing on what your cur­rent lev­el of knowl­edge allows.

A social prob­lem can have dif­fer­ent lev­els - social, eco­log­i­cal, eco­nom­ic.

  • Social dimen­sion: This relates to inter­per­son­al inter­ac­tions and social struc­tures. This includes aspects such as social jus­tice, edu­ca­tion, health and social net­works.
  • Eco­log­i­cal dimen­sion: This con­cerns envi­ron­men­tal and cli­mate issues. Chal­lenges in this area include cli­mate change, loss of bio­di­ver­si­ty, soil degra­da­tion and water short­ages.
  • Eco­nom­ic dimen­sion: This refers to eco­nom­ic aspects such as income, wealth or eco­nom­ic devel­op­ment.

Exam­ple:

“Many peo­ple in rur­al areas of Lebanon have no access to clean drink­ing water.”

Iden­ti­fy the caus­es of the prob­lem

To under­stand the cen­tral prob­lem in depth, you can ana­lyze its caus­es in four steps. Start with the ques­tion: Why does this prob­lem exist?

1. iden­ti­fies main cause cat­e­gories

Divide the prob­lem into main caus­es, which you can assign to the fol­low­ing cat­e­gories:

  • Social trends (demo­graph­ic change, urban­iza­tion, dig­i­tal­iza­tion, reg­u­la­tions, e.g. laws, ordi­nances, stan­dards…)
  • Appli­ca­tion of tech­nol­o­gy (fos­sil or renew­able ener­gies, e‑learning plat­forms, telemed­i­cine)
  • Eco­nom­ic con­di­tions (unem­ploy­ment, income dis­tri­b­u­tion, infla­tion)
  • Cul­tur­al under­stand­ing (tra­di­tions and cus­toms, val­ues and norms)
  • Envi­ron­men­tal con­di­tions (cli­mate change, avail­abil­i­ty of resources, nat­ur­al dis­as­ters)
  • Insti­tu­tions (edu­ca­tion­al insti­tu­tions, health orga­ni­za­tions, asso­ci­a­tions, local ini­tia­tives)
  • Polit­i­cal con­di­tions (gov­ern­ment sta­bil­i­ty, inter­na­tion­al rela­tions with trade agree­ments and sanc­tions)
  • Indi­vid­ual needs of groups of peo­ple (edu­ca­tion­al needs, health­care, hous­ing)
  • Exist­ing lev­el of knowl­edge in the pop­u­la­tion (lev­el of edu­ca­tion, aware­ness, tech­no­log­i­cal com­pe­tence)

2. iden­ti­fy the caus­es using the 5‑Whys tech­nique

To dive deep­er into the prob­lem, you can ask your­self for each iden­ti­fied cause: “Why is this hap­pen­ing?” and repeat this step five times. This allows you to iden­ti­fy the under­ly­ing caus­es. These caus­es form the roots of the prob­lem and help you to under­stand it in its entire­ty.

Exam­ple:

If the core prob­lem is “Many peo­ple in rur­al areas of Lebanon have no access to clean drink­ing water”, a 5‑Whys analy­sis could look like this:

  • Why don’t they have access to clean drink­ing water? — Because there are no water treat­ment plants.
  • Why are there no water treat­ment plants? — Because there is a lack of finan­cial resources.
  • Why is there a lack of fund­ing? — Because the local author­i­ties do not pro­vide suf­fi­cient bud­gets.
  • Why don’t local author­i­ties pro­vide suf­fi­cient bud­gets? — Because the prob­lem is not a high pri­or­i­ty.
  • Why is the prob­lem not a high pri­or­i­ty? — Because aware­ness of the health con­se­quences of a lack of access to clean drink­ing water is low.

3. include cur­rent sci­en­tif­ic find­ings in your analy­sis

Use data­bas­es such as Google Schol­ar, JSTOR or PubMed to find rel­e­vant stud­ies and research results. Pub­lic reports (UNDP, Ger­man gov­ern­ment, etc.), sta­tis­tics, doc­u­men­tary films, jour­nal­is­tic reports, news­pa­per arti­cles and pub­li­ca­tions from asso­ci­a­tions are also often help­ful. How­ev­er, you should check these for accu­ra­cy.

Attend­ing net­work meet­ings, indus­try events, con­fer­ences or trade fairs can also help you with your analy­sis. This data-based approach pro­vides objec­tive insights into the caus­es of the prob­lem and con­firms or refutes your assump­tions.

Ana­lyze the impact of the prob­lem

Once you have ana­lyzed the caus­es, you should iden­ti­fy the effects of the prob­lem. What con­se­quences does it have for those affect­ed and their envi­ron­ment?

1. deter­mine the effects using the 5‑Whys tech­nique

Use the same method as before and ask for each impact: “What are the con­se­quences?” and repeat this step to iden­ti­fy sys­temic effects on an eco­log­i­cal, polit­i­cal, social, eco­nom­ic, cul­tur­al, spir­i­tu­al, etc. lev­el.

2. include cur­rent sci­en­tif­ic find­ings in your analy­sis

When ana­lyz­ing the effects, you should also con­sult the lat­est research find­ings in order to gain sound insights into the long-term effects of the prob­lem. How you can do this is described above under Iden­ti­fy­ing the caus­es of the prob­lem.

3. visu­al­ize your prob­lem in a prob­lem tree

The prob­lem tree you can also use lat­er for com­mu­ni­ca­tion pur­pos­es. It graph­i­cal­ly depicts the caus­es and effects of the prob­lem. This is how you cre­ate a prob­lem tree:

  • Draw a box in the mid­dle of the dia­gram and write the core prob­lem in it.
  • The direct caus­es of the core prob­lem are record­ed in the line below the core prob­lem, with the caus­es of the caus­es pinned below.
  • The imme­di­ate effects are placed above the core prob­lem, the effects of the effects are entered in the row above. And so on.
  • The prob­lem tree branch­es upwards and down­wards.
  • If there are con­nec­tions between the caus­es or effects, these are mapped using cross-ref­er­ences. Gaps are marked using place­hold­ers, which you can fill in lat­er if nec­es­sary.

Use sim­ple draw­ing soft­ware or pen and paper to visu­al­ize the prob­lem tree. You can also find this graph­ic tem­plate in the PHI­NEO Effect course book:

Con­sid­er the sys­temic con­text

In order to under­stand the prob­lem holis­ti­cal­ly, you should place it in a larg­er sys­temic con­text. This will allow you to devel­op tar­get­ed mea­sures that address the caus­es at the right lev­el.

1. use the Social Change Matrix for a sys­temic clas­si­fi­ca­tion of your prob­lem

The Social Change Matrix divides the prob­lem into four quad­rants:

  • Quad­rant 1: Mate­r­i­al and struc­tur­al — prob­lems that affect large groups and require struc­tur­al changes, e.g. in laws or insti­tu­tions
  • Quad­rant 2: Mate­r­i­al and indi­vid­ual — con­se­quences of struc­tur­al prob­lems that affect indi­vid­u­als or small groups, e.g. lack of edu­ca­tion or pover­ty
  • Quad­rant 3: Sym­bol­ic and struc­tur­al — prob­lems that affect social per­cep­tions or beliefs and require, for exam­ple, changes in pub­lic dis­course
  • Quad­rant 4: Sym­bol­ic and indi­vid­ual — prob­lems relat­ing to per­son­al per­cep­tions or atti­tudes, e.g. low self-esteem

Con­sid­er in which quad­rant the prob­lem is expressed or man­i­fests itself and how, whether all quad­rants need to be includ­ed and where which caus­es and con­se­quences can be addressed. Mate­r­i­al changes are mea­sur­able and tan­gi­ble, where­as sym­bol­ic changes affect cul­tur­al and social atti­tudes.

Struc­tur­al changes affect soci­ety as a whole, while indi­vid­ual changes influ­ence the behav­ior and atti­tudes of indi­vid­u­als.

Some­times, how­ev­er, changes at the mate­r­i­al or sym­bol­ic indi­vid­ual lev­el also affect the sys­tem lev­el — i.e. not only top-down but also bot­tom-up. A change in val­ues (sym­bol­ic) can change the mate­r­i­al quad­rants in the long term or even rad­i­cal­ly.

Exam­ple:

Assume that the cen­tral prob­lem is “low envi­ron­men­tal aware­ness among the pop­u­la­tion”. This prob­lem could be clas­si­fied in quad­rant 3 (sym­bol­ic and struc­tur­al), as it affects social per­cep­tion and requires changes in pub­lic dis­course.

Mea­sures could include edu­ca­tion­al cam­paigns or polit­i­cal ini­tia­tives to raise envi­ron­men­tal aware­ness (sym­bol­ic) and change indi­vid­ual behav­ior (mate­r­i­al).

Define tar­get groups and stake­hold­ers

Based on your prob­lem analy­sis, you can now clear­ly iden­ti­fy your tar­get groups and stake­hold­ers. Think about who is direct­ly respon­si­ble for the caus­es of the prob­lem and who is affect­ed by the con­se­quences. These can be your poten­tial tar­get groups and stake­hold­ers.

1. who are your tar­get groups?

Tar­get groups are the peo­ple, orga­ni­za­tions or sys­tems you want to have an impact on. Those for whom you want to bring about con­crete change are your direct tar­get group. If nec­es­sary, you can form sub­groups here to cus­tomize your solu­tion more pre­cise­ly.

2 Who are your stake­hold­ers?

Stake­hold­ers are all per­sons or groups who have an inter­est in your solu­tion or can influ­ence it. Impor­tant: All tar­get groups are auto­mat­i­cal­ly stake­hold­ers — but not every stake­hold­er belongs to your tar­get group.

You can find out with a stake­hold­er analy­sis:

  • Who are the rel­e­vant inter­nal and exter­nal stake­hold­ers?
  • What expec­ta­tions, fears and hopes do they have?
  • How can they influ­ence your solu­tion pos­i­tive­ly or neg­a­tive­ly?

Exam­ples of stake­hold­ers:

  • Inter­nal stake­hold­ers: your tar­get group, employ­ees, man­age­ment.
  • Exter­nal stake­hold­ers: Investors, author­i­ties, NGOs, part­ner orga­ni­za­tions, cit­i­zens’ ini­tia­tives or com­pa­nies.

Tar­get group vs. cus­tomers

In the Lean Impact Jour­ney we dif­fer­en­ti­ate between the tar­get group when we deal with the impact mod­el and the prod­uct and cus­tomers when it comes to the busi­ness mod­el.

How you use these two terms for your project depends on what your solu­tion con­sists of. In this play­book, the tar­get group is defined as peo­ple who use the solu­tion and those who ben­e­fit from the solu­tion.

Depend­ing on the solu­tion, the tar­get group can com­bine both.

Next chap­ter: Val­i­dat­ing find­ings

The first step has been tak­en! You now know the caus­es and effects of the social prob­lem and your poten­tial tar­get group. You have also iden­ti­fied oth­er stake­hold­ers.

In the next chap­ter you can val­i­date your find­ings about your iden­ti­fied prob­lem and your tar­get groups and stake­hold­ers in a direct dis­cus­sion.